Ocoya
Tool · this deep dive is built from the official pages of the platform itself and of the tools that support it.
Overview
Ocoya describes itself briefly and verbatim like this: "Social media management. Using AI." — the running of social media with artificial intelligence. The tool creates and schedules content for several connected social accounts at once, the work is organised by workspaces and users, and the consumption of the AI functions is counted in credits.
Let us state at once where this description comes from, because it affects its completeness. Ocoya's feature pages are served empty: their content is substituted by a script. So the picture is assembled from the plan grid of the pricing page, the integrations page and the self-description in the footer — that is, from the places where the tool speaks about itself in figures and lists, rather than from the features block.
On the pages that were read — prices, integrations and terms of use — languages are not named at all. There is neither confirmation nor refutation for Russian, Arabic, Hindi or Chinese: language claims could not be read without executing scripts.
Which platforms it works with
The platforms are listed by name, and the tool itself divides them into two states.
Direct publishing and scheduling are declared for five platforms: Facebook — business pages, Instagram — business profiles, X (Twitter), LinkedIn and Pinterest. Note the reservation about account types at Facebook and Instagram: what connects are pages and business profiles, not personal accounts.
In beta status seven more are named: Threads, TikTok, Google Business, YouTube Shorts, Discord, Telegram and Slack. The beta status is put there by the integrations page itself, and we carry it over without smoothing: this is the tool's own statement about the incompleteness of the integration, not our assessment.
The practical difference between the two lists the page does not explain — what exactly beta means with regard to publishing is not stated there.
The number of connectable profiles, meanwhile, is limited by plan, while the composition of the platforms is not: on Bronze and on Diamond the list is the same, and only how many accounts may be connected to it differs. More on that in the section on restrictions.
What is absent from the list: email mailings, messengers other than Telegram and Discord in beta, and any platforms beyond the twelve listed. Export as a file is not declared on the pages that were read either.
Pricing
The prices are from the pricing page, the currency is dollars. There are four steps.
Bronze — 15 USD a month. Silver — 39 USD a month. Gold — 79 USD a month. Diamond — 159 USD a month.
The cheapest step is Bronze at 15 USD a month. The step between the tiers is uneven: from Bronze to Silver the price grows two and a half times, then twofold and twofold again. What grows along with it is set out in the section on restrictions.
About annual payment a separate reservation is needed, and it concerns the source itself. A Monthly/Yearly toggle is on the page, and a 20% discount for annual payment is declared next to it. But in the text of the page both columns contain the same monthly figures: the recalculated annual sums the page does not show. That is, the discount is announced while the resulting numbers are unknown to us, and we will not substitute them by a multiplication of our own.
What is free
Ocoya has no permanent free plan: no such step is declared on the pricing page.
What is declared is a seven-day free trial, and on all plans at once. This is a trial period, not a free plan: at its end there is no free place at the tool to fall back to.
The conditions of the trial — whether a card is needed on signing up, which functions it includes and how many credits are given — the pricing page does not disclose. The trial period surely has rules, but they are not on the page that was read.
The difference between a trial period and a free plan is worth spelling out separately, because on pricing pages they often stand side by side and look alike. A free plan is a permanent place where you may live as long as you like with reduced limits. A trial is seven days of access, after which you must pay or leave. Ocoya has only the second.
Restrictions
The restrictions at Ocoya are of two parts: credits per month and the number of connections. For a social media scheduler the second is often more important than the first.
Bronze — 100 credits, 1 workspace, 1 user, 5 social profiles.
Silver — 500 credits, 5 workspaces, 5 users, 20 profiles.
Gold — 1500 credits, 20 workspaces, 20 users, 50 profiles.
Diamond — credits without limit, workspaces without limit, 50 users, 150 profiles.
Note the asymmetry on the senior step: credits and workspaces become unlimited, while users and profiles remain rationed — 50 and 150 respectively. That is, Diamond still has a ceiling; it simply runs along the number of connectable accounts and people rather than the volume of generation.
The main thing about the credits the pricing page does not explain: what exactly one credit is deducted for and how often it renews is not stated there. Without that, 100 and 500 credits can be compared only with each other, but not with a real volume of work. This is a gap in the source, and there is nothing to fill it with.
Rights to the output
There is no answer, and the nature of this absence is a particular one here.
The terms of use that were read do not distribute rights to the content created in the tool at all. They contain rules of conduct, a disclaimer of warranties, the procedure for terminating access and the applicable law of Lithuania — but a clause on intellectual property in the output is not in them.
This is not an excuse of the "the document was not read" kind: the document was read in full, and the required section is simply not there. Differences by plan are not declared in this part either.
From the silence of the terms it does NOT follow that the rights are transferred to the user. From it exactly one thing follows: the question of who owns the text and the picture made in Ocoya the document does not settle. For a tool whose AI generation is charged in credits, the absence of such a clause in the terms is a noticeable gap, worth knowing about before the result goes into a commercial publication.
Do they train on your data
Nothing is said.
In the terms of use and the privacy policy that were read, training models on what the user enters is not mentioned — neither as permitted nor as excluded.
A mechanism for opting out is accordingly not described in these documents either. There is formally nothing to opt out of, since the training itself is not declared — but neither of the two documents gives an assurance that no training happens.
The difference must be kept in mind. "They do not train" and "they did not write whether they train" are different answers. The second is an omission from which neither a permission nor a prohibition can be derived.
How you earn with it
With commercial use of the output the situation follows directly from the section on rights: the terms do not distribute rights to what is created at all. Neither a permission to earn on generated texts and pictures nor a prohibition is in the document.
For an instrument that by its nature is made for the sake of commercial publications — posts on business pages and business profiles — this means that the legal side will have to be clarified with the company itself. The pricing page does not answer that question, and the terms do not answer it either.
What is known for certain and bears on the matter: there is no free plan, so the tariff boundary of "on the free plan you may not earn", which many other tools have, simply does not exist at Ocoya. All work here is paid after the seven days of the trial.
What it will not do
Here Ocoya's list is detailed — this is the one thoroughly worked-out part of the terms (section 1).
Content that is unlawful, threatening, abusive, harassing, defamatory and deceptive is forbidden. Forbidden too is content that invades other people's privacy.
Explicit descriptions of sexual acts are forbidden directly.
By a separate clause, content that humiliates or intimidates people on grounds of religion, sex, sexual orientation, race, ethnicity, age or disability is forbidden — the list of grounds is given in the terms by name.
Infringing other people's intellectual property rights is not allowed.
Spam and unsolicited mass mailings are forbidden, and along with them chain letters, lotteries and gambling. For a social media scheduler this restriction is a practical one: mailing scenarios are not run through here.
Viruses and passing yourself off as another are forbidden by separate clauses. The second bears on AI generation too: writing in someone else's name the terms do not permit.
And one more, a rare one: access to the tool from jurisdictions where the content of the site is unlawful is forbidden directly. This restriction is not about what you publish but about where you work from.
What the terms do not forbid explicitly — or rather, what they are silent about: requirements to mark generated text as made by AI are not in them, and watermarks, metadata and C2PA are not mentioned. No conclusion that no marks exist can be drawn from this.
Verified data
The checked data this deep dive rests on.
About the platform
an AI social media management platform, self-described verbatim as «Social media management. Using AI.» Creating and scheduling content for several connected social accounts at once, working by workspaces and users, with AI feature consumption counted in credits
the feature pages are delivered empty — their content is inserted by a script; the description is therefore assembled from the plan grid, the integrations page and the self-description in the footer rather than from the features block
source, checked 2026-08-07
Platforms
direct publishing and scheduling: Facebook (business pages), Instagram (business profiles), X (Twitter), LinkedIn, Pinterest; in beta — Threads, TikTok, Google Business, YouTube Shorts, Discord, Telegram, Slack
the beta status of some integrations is stated by the page itself and carried over without smoothing
source, checked 2026-08-07
Pricing
Bronze 15 USD, Silver 39 USD, Gold 79 USD, Diamond 159 USD a month; a 20 per cent discount is claimed for yearly billing, but the page does not show the recalculated yearly amounts
source, checked 2026-08-07
15 USD a month (the Bronze plan)
source, checked 2026-08-07
Limits and restrictions
credits a month and the number of connections: Bronze — 100 credits, 1 workspace, 1 user, 5 social profiles; Silver — 500 credits, 5 workspaces, 5 users, 20 profiles; Gold — 1500 credits, 20 workspaces, 20 users, 50 profiles; Diamond — unlimited credits, unlimited workspaces, 50 users, 150 profiles
what exactly consumes one credit, and how often it renews, the pricing page does not explain
source, checked 2026-08-07
Restrictions
content that is unlawful, threatening, abusive, harassing, defamatory, deceptive, invasive of another's privacy or containing explicit descriptions of sexual acts is forbidden; content that demeans or intimidates people on grounds of religion, sex, sexual orientation, race, ethnicity, age or disability is forbidden; infringing others' IP rights, spam and unsolicited bulk mailings, chain letters, lotteries and gambling, viruses and impersonation are forbidden. Separately: access from jurisdictions where the site's content is unlawful is forbidden
section 1 of the terms — the only part of them worked out in detail
source, checked 2026-08-07
Catalogue section: all similar See also: catalogue index · scheduler comparison · find by situation · platform restrictions